| Km | Altitude | Gain | Gradient | Max | 0–15% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 300 m | +72 m | 7.2% | 11% |
|
| 2 | 402 m | +103 m | 10.3% | 15.2% |
|
| 3 | 481 m | +79 m | 7.9% | 9.2% |
|
| 4 | 571 m | +90 m | 9.0% | 12.8% |
|
| 5 | 664 m | +92 m | 9.2% | 11.5% |
|
| 6 | 752 m | +88 m | 8.8% | 11% |
|
| 7 | 801 m | +49 m | 4.9% | 10% |
|
| 8 | 874 m | +73 m | 7.3% | 14.6% |
|
| 9 | 945 m | +71 m | 7.1% | 10.6% |
|
| 10 | 986 m | +41 m | 4.1% | 7% |
|
| 11 | 1061 m | +75 m | 7.5% | 8.6% |
|
| 12 | 1136 m | +75 m | 7.5% | 11.4% |
|
| 13 | 1214 m | +78 m | 7.8% | 14.2% |
|
| 14 | 1283 m | +69 m | 6.9% | 11.6% |
|
| 15 | 1323 m | +40 m | 4.8% | 7.2% |
|
Difficulty score is length × gradient, weighted for the steepest kilometre.
Riders’ photos, notes and corrections make every profile better.